| 1 |
On 18/11/2007, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 18-11-2007 09:05:46 +1000, Peter Ansell wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I did some experimenting with crossdev in my OS X Leopard prefix and |
| 6 |
> > found that it was failing looking for /etc/portage... so I made up a |
| 7 |
> > patch for the places where it does this. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I know crossdev isn't keyworded at all, and this is possibly not the |
| 10 |
> > place to post patches, but I am new to this. The patch possibly isn't |
| 11 |
> > perfect as I just inserted ${EPREFIX} into a few lines... |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Any suggestions for where to submit future patches would be great. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> The patch looks fine. ${EPREFIX} should have been quoted, however. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I don't have any strict policy on where or what. Here is fine, |
| 18 |
> especially if you ask for some discussion, which is what you do IMHO. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Anyhow, how far do/did you get with this? I have experimented a fair |
| 21 |
> bit with cross-compiling, with not much success. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I was able to use the crossdev script to do some elementary stuff |
| 25 |
after those changes. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I am trying to get an i686-pc-linux-gnu compiler/toolchain inside my |
| 28 |
i686-apple-darwin9 prefix. I got to the end of the binutils |
| 29 |
compilation and it complained about symbols/names that were not going |
| 30 |
to work at installation. I then hacked around that as it kind of |
| 31 |
suggested by putting FEATURES="allow_broken_install_names" in |
| 32 |
make.conf, only to find that gcc complained the next time because the |
| 33 |
.dylib files were not correct, which was the expected behaviour after |
| 34 |
hacking around the first error. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
I will privately email you the log files to see whether you can make |
| 37 |
any sense of them. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Peter |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives