1 |
I didn't mean to presume that everything was going to be okay with it :) |
2 |
|
3 |
As for using python-2.4 for the bootstrapping, I ended up just |
4 |
skipping that step after trying it once and having it fail. 2.5 |
5 |
installed nicely during the emerge -e system step. |
6 |
|
7 |
I also skipped the installation of subversion into the prefix as apr |
8 |
wasn't working, but apart from that I was extremely impressed by the |
9 |
ability to bootstrap Gentoo into a directory inside my new Leopard OS |
10 |
X installation. |
11 |
|
12 |
Cheers, |
13 |
|
14 |
Peter |
15 |
|
16 |
On 07/11/2007, Elias Pipping <pipping@g.o> wrote: |
17 |
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:11:35AM +1000, Peter Ansell wrote: |
18 |
> > Hi, |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > I am testing out the prefix overlay on OS X Leopard and I came across |
21 |
> > a warning when emerging coreutils, not sure whether it matters. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > rm: /Users/peter/Library/Gentoo/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/coreutils-6.9-r1/image/Users/peter/Library/Gentoo//usr/bin/su: |
24 |
> > No such file or directory |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Potentially it could have installed something to $EPREFIX/usr/bin that |
27 |
> > it didn't want to, but I am not sure what it was. The error about su |
28 |
> > not being a valid command is the worrying bit I guess. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > So far so good, except for python failing, the rest have worked well. |
31 |
> > Why is the prefix still using python-2.4 btw. The system default 2.5 |
32 |
> > seems to be reasonable for this, and my PC Pentium 4 ~x86 |
33 |
> > installation. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> You should have seen the message 'leopard is not yet supported' or |
36 |
> something like that when bootstrapping ;) |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Gentoo/Alt has only been working on Leopard for a couple of days and the |
39 |
> docs aren't up-to-date yet. Naturally, one doesn't have to bootstrap |
40 |
> python 2.4 on leopard. One wouldn't have to bootstrap python 2.5 either |
41 |
> -- let's see what happens once 2.6 or 3.0 is out ;) |
42 |
> |
43 |
> As for su -- i suppose it wasn't even built because you're not root (or |
44 |
> not logged in as root) -- removing it is therefore not necessary, but |
45 |
> trying doesn't hurt. Not removing it when it was built would hurt ;) |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
> -- Elias |
49 |
> |
50 |
> PS: as you can see in /usr/portage/dev-lang/python, 2.4 is no longer |
51 |
> being used anywhere but in bootstrapping |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |