| 1 |
On Sat, 23 May 2015 15:47:04 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> My experience is quite the opposite: With graphite, I had |
| 6 |
> many random crashes (and seldom also unexplainable compiler |
| 7 |
> errors which vanish without graphite). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
My whole system has been compiled with graphite since its introduction |
| 11 |
and I've never seen any problems. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What gcc flags are you using to enable graphite? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Usually, -floop-interchange, -floop-strip-mine, and -floop-block are |
| 16 |
enough. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
One can go further with -ftree-loop-distribution and -ftree-vectorize |
| 19 |
and maybe even others. AFAIK these extra graphite options may cause |
| 20 |
problems. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regarding LTO, I experienced a severe problem with ghostscipt due to |
| 23 |
what I later traced to LTO: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691768 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Ever since that time I disabled LTO completely. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Frank Peters |
Archives