Archives
Archives
| From: | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-amd64] Re: Status of Gcc-5.1.0? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 23 May 2015 15:47:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | slrnmm187o.5a4.martin@lounge.imp.fu-berlin.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Status of Gcc-5.1.0? by Frank Peters |
||
| 1 | Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Also, as opposed to link-time optimization (LTO), gcc-graphite is |
| 4 | > stable. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | My experience is quite the opposite: With graphite, I had |
| 7 | many random crashes (and seldom also unexplainable compiler |
| 8 | errors which vanish without graphite). The situation did not |
| 9 | improve or got even worse with 4.8 to 4.9. |
| 10 | OTOH, with LTO there are sometimes link errors (unsurprisingly), |
| 11 | but usually it works smoothly. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Status of Gcc-5.1.0? | Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> |