Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: upgrade an old system
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 11:58:21
Message-Id: 200905061358.13170.volkerarmin@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: upgrade an old system by Mark Haney
1 On Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009, Mark Haney wrote:
2 > Duncan wrote:
3 > > Consider pointing PORTAGE_TMPDIR at a tmpfs.
4 > >
5 > > The idea is based on the fact that everything portage does in its tmpdir
6 > > (/var/tmp by default) is temporary, erased as soon as it's done emerging
7 > > that package. Since tmpfs uses swap backed memory, worst-case, it has to
8 > > write to swap -- that is, to disk, which is where it would otherwise be
9 > > writing ALL the temporary files. With memory access so much faster than
10 > > disk access, every file that's erased before it hits disk saves time, and
11 > > it can make a BIG difference in emerge times.
12 >
13 > Duncan, you talk about tmpfs and I'm suddenly interested in trying this
14 > out. My question is, how much space do you allocate for the tmpfs? I
15 > know it'll fall back to swap if I'm out of space there, but what works
16 > well for you? I have (currently) 1GB RAM on this system, but I'm
17 > getting ready to order more to get me to 4GB.
18
19
20 2gb. That is enough for almost everything. Not enough for openoffice.
21 tmpfs 2,0G 3,2M 2,0G 1% /var/tmp/portage
22 tmpfs 1,0G 116K 1,0G 1% /tmp

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: upgrade an old system Mark Haney <mhaney@××××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: upgrade an old system Josh Sled <jsled@××××××××××××.org>