1 |
2008/12/17 anorexicsumo <anorexicsumo@×××××.com>: |
2 |
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> well, for me icedtea works as long as you remove any gcj from the system and |
4 |
>> just compile gcc with gcj use flag, and this will take a very huge |
5 |
>> amount of time, |
6 |
>> let's say that you could go to town (about 15km of distance) for |
7 |
>> christmass shopping |
8 |
>> and then get back and you'll still have it working, especially if |
9 |
>> you're on multilib. |
10 |
>> you'll then need the original sun jdk to compile icedtea6 from java |
11 |
>> overlay. if you |
12 |
>> follow this and build icedtea6 with sunjdk then it will quite build |
13 |
>> and work until |
14 |
>> the new java update will be released. just remember that icedtea6 takes a huge |
15 |
>> amount of time to build too and i don't really know if it really |
16 |
>> worths rebuilding it. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/betelgeuse/2008/12/17/binary_packages_for_icedtea6 |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> This just popped up on my RSS reader. The main gist is there is now a |
22 |
> icedtea6-bin package in java-overlay. I haven't tested it yet but i |
23 |
> now have icedtea6-bin installed. I plan to mess around with it later |
24 |
> when I get home and see what I can break. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I've played with icedtea in the past and managed to get it to work |
27 |
> after a long time fiddling with it. Hopefully a binary file will be an |
28 |
> easier solution then rebuilding gcc and such things. |
29 |
> |
30 |
well, if you've ever got icedtea installed you should also have |
31 |
compiled gcc with |
32 |
gcj. if you haven't done it then i think you've had a big pain in the |
33 |
a** having it |
34 |
to work. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
dott. ing. beso |