| 1 |
Tres Melton posted <1128118297.6208.265.camel@×××××××××.org>, excerpted |
| 2 |
below, on Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:11:37 -0600: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> You have had so many problems with the other kernels doing this stuff |
| 5 |
> and now that you have found a good one I really think that you should |
| 6 |
> compose a message entitled "Latencies in the kernel" and post a summary |
| 7 |
> of your experiences with the various kernels to the LKML. I think that |
| 8 |
> it would benefit the developers (and all of us) to know that the kernel |
| 9 |
> seems to be tuned rather nicely now to tasking these things. Anyway, |
| 10 |
> I'm glad that it is working for you. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Note that it's not the vanilla kernel, but the vanilla kernel with the |
| 13 |
real-time patches. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Still, yes, posting something to LKML is a good idea, as one of the |
| 16 |
ongoing debates has to do with the merits of the various real-time patches |
| 17 |
as opposed to other factors, and this sort of direct user testimony could |
| 18 |
be influential. Of course, don't be surprised if you immediately get |
| 19 |
asked to do testing on RT related stuff! |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
(Noting that I dont' follow LKML directly, but do follow happenings in |
| 22 |
general thru LWN's weekly coverage and occasionally find myself browsing |
| 23 |
various LKML threads as well.) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 27 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 28 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 29 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives