Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Mark Haney <mhaney@××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: portage dependency?
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:13:42
Message-Id: 4951001C.10602@ercbroadband.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: portage dependency? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 Duncan wrote:
2 > "Mark Haney" <mhaney@××××××××××××.org> posted
3 > 494FE6D7.2060408@××××××××××××.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Dec 2008
4 > 14:13:27 -0500:
5 >
6 >> I've been updating my system after having some surgery and taking time
7 >> off from everything and I've noticed a funny thing. Certain packages are
8 >> requiring that I install v2.1.4.5 or portage (I'm running 2.1.6.2 now)
9 >> before updating the other packages. Why is that?
10 >
11 > So you're saying they're asking you to downgrade? Do you have an example
12 > and is it in the main tree or some overlay (which)?
13 >
14 > I /think/ that'd be a bug as to date portage has been backward compatible
15 > such that new versions should handle old ebuilds just fine, but I can't
16 > say for sure without an example to look at the code on and see what it's
17 > actually trying to do, where and why.
18 >
19 > What I suspect is happening is that it's depending on a specific portage
20 > version, say =2.1.4*, instead of a slot, which portage should support
21 > everything at least in the main tree. IOW it shouldn't be happening in
22 > the main tree. However, it could still be occurring in some obscure
23 > overlay that doesn't get much testing from ~portage, maybe one that has
24 > mostly paludis or pkgcore users?
25 >
26 > But it's all speculation until there's an example to look at, and the
27 > problem sounds strange enough I'm doubting I'm reading what you said
28 > correctly in the first place.
29 >
30
31
32
33 It seems anything java related and mplayer as well. Which of course I
34 don't understand at all. It also might be a required portage version as
35 you say, but I don't know how to determine that.
36
37
38 octavian ~ # emerge -uav ant-core
39
40 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
41
42 Calculating dependencies... done!
43 [ebuild UD] sys-apps/portage-2.1.4.5 [2.1.6.2] USE="-build -doc
44 -epydoc (-selinux)" LINGUAS="-pl" 0 kB
45 *** Portage will stop merging at this point and reload itself,
46 then resume the merge.
47 [ebuild U ] dev-java/ant-core-1.7.1-r2 [1.7.0-r1] USE="-doc -source"
48 6,828 kB
49
50 ---
51 Calculating dependencies... done!
52 [ebuild UD] sys-apps/portage-2.1.4.5 [2.1.6.2] USE="-build -doc
53 -epydoc (-selinux)" LINGUAS="-pl" 0 kB
54 [ebuild U ] dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.11 [1.6.0.07] USE="X alsa
55 (-nsplugin) -odbc" 0 kB
56
57 ----
58
59 [ebuild UD] sys-apps/portage-2.1.4.5 [2.1.6.2] USE="-build -doc
60 -epydoc (-selinux)" LINGUAS="-pl" 0 kB
61 [ebuild U ] media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1
62 [1.0_rc2_p27725-r1] USE="X a52 aac alsa arts ass%* dvd encode iconv ipv6
63 jpeg mad mmx mp3opengl png
64
65
66
67
68
69 --
70 Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione
71 quadraturae circuli
72
73 Mark Haney
74 Sr. Systems Administrator
75 ERC Broadband
76 (828) 350-2415
77
78 Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: portage dependency? Mark Haney <mhaney@××××××××××××.org>
[gentoo-amd64] Re: portage dependency? Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>