1 |
On 10/4/05, Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 05 October 2005 03:37, Jared Lindsay wrote: |
3 |
> > I really like nitro-sources. They aren't supported in any official way, but |
4 |
> > you can find them in the Unsupported Software section on the Gentoo Forums. |
5 |
> > The current release is 2.6.13.2-nitro1 ("Down with latency"), but I would |
6 |
> > maybe advise waiting until nitro2 comes out (seppe, the maintainer, said it |
7 |
> > would hopefully be soon), as it will fix a lagging issue with the ck5 |
8 |
> > patchset. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> nitro? |
11 |
> aren't that the ones who like to destroy filesystems? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> btw - lower latency = lower throughput = lower overall performance. |
14 |
|
15 |
lower latency = lower throughput == YES |
16 |
|
17 |
lower throughput = lower overall performance == NOT NECESSARILY |
18 |
|
19 |
It depends on how you measure performance. For me performance means |
20 |
that real time audio, such as vocals from a singer, flow through the |
21 |
machine without being delayed enough for the singer to hear the delay. |
22 |
That's performance since without it the machine is useless. |
23 |
|
24 |
Granted, I get fewer MIPS, etc., but the machine's performance, as I |
25 |
measure it, is higher. |
26 |
|
27 |
Cheers, |
28 |
Mark |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |