| 1 |
Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com> posted |
| 2 |
d257c3560710180732t6d270ca1pec4697ea7fc5817a@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
| 3 |
below, on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:32:11 +0200: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> i recompiled gcc and used portage and that worked. i think that mine is |
| 6 |
> a paludis bug. i'll post the bug on the paludis bugzilla. thanks for |
| 7 |
> your help anyway. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Thanks for the fix report. You may be right. I've not used paludis. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Talking about which... does paludis have proper binary package support |
| 12 |
yet? That's the main reason I hadn't tried it back some time ago (when |
| 13 |
ciaranm was still a Gentoo dev, IIRC). Portage's FEATURES=buildpkg is my |
| 14 |
favorite underdocumented power-user portage feature (for all sorts of |
| 15 |
reasons I could detail but don't really belong in this post), and back |
| 16 |
then, paludis didn't handle binpkgs at all, let alone have anything as |
| 17 |
useful as portage's tar.bz2-with-some-extra-metadata-tacked-on binpkg |
| 18 |
format, so regardless of paludis' other features, there was simply no way |
| 19 |
I could seriously consider it. Maybe that has changed by now? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 23 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 24 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives