Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: "Morgan Wesström" <gentoo-amd64@×××××××××.biz>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Symlinks vs. Bind mounts.
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:21:19
Message-Id: 48A15670.1060605@pp.dyndns.biz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Symlinks vs. Bind mounts. by Beso
1 > you'll use swap partition. but you'll not allocate all that ram space
2 > with openoffice. i've tried to compile it twice. first time it was on
3 > disk and it took almost 14 hours of compilation. the second time was on
4 > tmpfs with 3.8gb and a 6gb swap file and it took less than 8 hours and
5
6 If I understand you correctly, I wouldn't be able to compile Open Office
7 on tmpfs with my 2GB RAM and 1GB swap. I would have to increase the swap
8 space to be able to hold all the temporary files from the compilation,
9 wouldn't I?
10 /Morgan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Symlinks vs. Bind mounts. Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Symlinks vs. Bind mounts. Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org>