Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Amoeba file system
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:05:43
Message-Id: 200704091202.47469.prh@gotadsl.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Amoeba file system by dustin@v.igoro.us
1 On Sunday 08 April 2007 15:53:32 dustin@×××××××.us wrote:
2
3 > Looking at the ebuild, the only thing I see that could do that is the call
4 > to grub itself, and it's probably a serious bug, possibly writing a bit or
5 > byte to the wrong block of the drive.
6
7 It's changing the file-system field from 0x83 to 0x93. Perhaps an XOR with
8 0xC0. (My 1974 assembler days are showing!)
9
10 > This looks similar:
11 > http://www.computing.net/linux/wwwboard/forum/28589.html
12
13 Hm. Perhaps, though I'd say it wasn't quite the same.
14
15 > I would suggest narrowing it down by running 'fsdisk' in the ebuild
16 > directly before and after the grub invocation:
17 >
18 > fdisk -l /dev/hda; sleep 3
19
20 Actually, I used "fdisk -l /dev/hda; sleep 3 | \"; otherwise the script hung
21 at that point.
22
23 > /sbin/grub --batch \
24 > --device-map="${dir}"/grub/device.map \
25 >
26 > > /dev/null
27 >
28 > fdisk -l /dev/hda; sleep 3
29
30 Ok, I tried that and the partition table was left untouched - the behaviour
31 had changed by instrumenting it. So I deleted the first call to fdisk,
32 remerged grub-static and got my problem back. Looks like we have (someone
33 has) a timing problem.
34
35 > and if that does, indeed, change the partition table, then file a bug
36 > with the grub:
37 > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-legacy-bugs.en.html
38
39 You don't think I should file a bug on gentoo first?
40
41 > > Now I'm going to have to boot a CD and run fdisk to delete and
42 > > re-create /dev/hda1, then chroot to the root partition and run grub to
43 > > reinstall itself.
44 >
45 > So long as you don't restart, just running 'fdisk' and resetting the
46 > type should do the trick. The kernel won't recognize the change
47 > immediately, but that's ok -- it will be written to disk (for better or
48 > worse, this is exactly what grub's doing). So you should be able to
49 > test this without having to restart.
50
51 A useful short-cut - thanks! What's more, it works.
52
53 > From the look of the ebuild, there is no 64-bit version -- it builds a
54 > 32-bit version unconditionally. I may be misreading that, though.
55
56 I suppose what I meant was "the standard version that can be compiled on a
57 multi-lib system that's mostly 64-bit", rather than a precompiled version
58 (which is 32-bit).
59
60 Thanks for the help, Justin, Duncan and Jean-Marc.
61
62 --
63 Rgds
64 Peter Humphrey
65 Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93
66 --
67 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Amoeba file system Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>