1 |
Latest release works well, the only thing is no flash! XD so i have |
2 |
firefox-bin for my you-tube and gvideo fun time! |
3 |
|
4 |
On 1/3/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss03@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 09:49, "Mark Haney" <mhaney@××××××××××××.org> |
7 |
> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] firefox 2 on amd64': |
8 |
> > Stefan Vunckx wrote: |
9 |
> > Okay I compiled and installed it, it works great but does anyone else |
10 |
> > see it in their menu list as 'Bon Echo'? I also see that in the title |
11 |
> > bar. I haven't rebooted or regenerated my kde menu since compiling it, |
12 |
> > but will doing that fix the menu? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> As others have mentioned, check the mozbranding USE flag. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Any binaries that aren't from the pristine source (e.g. with any |
17 |
> unapproved |
18 |
> patches) that use the Mozilla Branding (i.e. the Firefox name and Icon, |
19 |
> controlled in Gentoo with the mozbranding USE flag) are subject to the |
20 |
> same issue that Debian saw during the "IceWeasel" debacle |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Personally, I deal with enough branding, so I leave the mozbranding USE |
23 |
> flag off. [As a side-effect, any packages or binaries I build can be |
24 |
> freely distributed under my choice of the GPL or MPL since they are not |
25 |
> subject to trademark issues.] |
26 |
> |
27 |
> -- |
28 |
> "If there's one thing we've established over the years, |
29 |
> it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest |
30 |
> clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." |
31 |
> -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Karma, It's Real! |
39 |
"No penguins were harmed during the writing, just a bunch of broken windows |
40 |
to let them escape..."-xtacocorex |