| 1 |
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 18:24:33 Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 17:23 +0200, Åsmund Grammeltvedt wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > However, it may just create it with USE=build. Check the |
| 4 |
> > > vdb in your stage1 to see what package owns the /root directory. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > ccache, apparently. Baselayout _should_ also create /root, but something |
| 7 |
> > seems to go wrong along the way. I guess I should rebuild and check the |
| 8 |
> > logs. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Please do. If you find it to be an issue with baselayout, please file a |
| 11 |
> bug so we can get it fixed before we start our next release. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Hm, I haven't had time to actually check if this happens, but the current |
| 14 |
theory is this: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Baselayout creates /root, but avoids becoming the owner by |
| 17 |
generating /usr/share/baselayout/mkdirs.sh and then running it in |
| 18 |
pkg_preinst. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
When ccache is unmerged at the end of the stage build, it removes /root, since |
| 21 |
its the sole owner. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Does that seem plausible? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Åsmund Grammeltvedt |
| 27 |
Snap TV |
Archives