1 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:45:48 -0400 |
2 |
Andrew D Kirch <trelane@×××××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
> Its the opinion of the User Relations team that the Council should |
4 |
> reconsider the current Leadership in charge of the PMS Standards |
5 |
> Working group. Its the feeling of User Relations that interested |
6 |
> parties in the PMS standard are being hindered by communication |
7 |
> issues on the process and procedures required to implement changes. |
8 |
|
9 |
I agree. I'd like the Council to appoint a qualitied PMS leader who is |
10 |
empowered to moderate posts to gentoo-dev@ from people who consistently |
11 |
post FUD about EAPI and PMS related issues. I believe that doing so |
12 |
will substantially reduce the amount of noise involved in the |
13 |
discussion, and will enable us to have sensible PMS related discussions |
14 |
without them being derailed by trolls. Also, it'll be harder for those |
15 |
trolls to post nonsense like "PMS isn't for Portage" and "PMS is about |
16 |
Exherbo, not Gentoo" if a Gentoo developer is prepared to step in and |
17 |
address all the crap instead of leaving it to me... |
18 |
|
19 |
I suggest asking any potential candidates to start by addressing bug |
20 |
282470. That should give a good indication of how well they're going to |
21 |
work with the people who do the grunt work on PMS. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |