| 1 |
On 18:49 Mon 17 Nov , Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
| 2 |
> So we could end up with only 1 council member in the worst case? ;) |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Yes, although worst is a matter of definition. If the developer |
| 5 |
community wants what is effectively a benevolent dictator, then let's |
| 6 |
give it to them. This is, after all, a community distribution so we |
| 7 |
should do what the community wants. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I don't think that's something we really want. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The majority of developers should choose what kind of leadership they |
| 12 |
want, instead of us deciding for them. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> In my opinion we need to have at minimum 5 council members to make |
| 15 |
> sure there's some kind of redundancy plus to get different views and |
| 16 |
> ideas on issues brought up to the council. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Anyone can contribute views and ideas ... why do you need to be on the |
| 19 |
council to do that? Most of the issues are discussed on -dev, and I've |
| 20 |
pushed to make that a requirement and meetings as primarily just votes. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Thanks, |
| 24 |
Donnie |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 27 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 28 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives