1 |
On 23:52 Tue 04 Mar , Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> Ahh... I had read the upstream changelog, but not Gentoo's. EXA not |
3 |
> working on r200 could indeed be a problem here too, as that's what I'm |
4 |
> currently using. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Do you need any additional data or perhaps xorg logs (maybe with some |
7 |
> sort of additional debugging enabled)? Upstream and Gentoo bug numbers? |
8 |
> Does this seem to be on all r200s or just some of them? Etc. Surely |
9 |
> they had tested on r200 and it worked on what they had tested? (... |
10 |
> which would imply it's only some of them?) |
11 |
|
12 |
Loading the drm/radeon kernel modules with debug=1 might produce some |
13 |
additional data if you can reproduce the problem. I haven't filed any |
14 |
bugs on the matter, but I have talked to one of the driver developers. |
15 |
For me, this problem was rapid lockups of X when running gnome-terminal |
16 |
and Firefox. I got it on both my Radeons, an 8500 and a 9600 Pro. |
17 |
|
18 |
> would love to upgrade to something with dual dual-link DVI- D, and |
19 |
> run, eventually, dual Apple Cinema 30" equivalents. Or is it possible |
20 |
> to run them on single link each at a lower refresh (17 Hz or |
21 |
> whatever), and is that actually usable (it wouldn't be on CRT, but |
22 |
> might be on LCD)? Anyway, as best I can tell, I need an r300 |
23 |
> generation minimum, as it's simply not possible to do dual dual-link |
24 |
> DVI out on the r200 generation. |
25 |
|
26 |
Don't think the radeon driver does dual-link yet, although I could be |
27 |
wrong. With single link, you can do about 1900x1200 on a |
28 |
reduced-blanking mode. These modes were designed for LCDs so they should |
29 |
be fine on one. |
30 |
|
31 |
It's called reduced blanking because CRTs used to require the vertical |
32 |
blanking time to aim the gun back up to the top left of the monitor from |
33 |
the bottom right, but LCDs no longer require that. |
34 |
|
35 |
Thanks, |
36 |
Donnie |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-desktop@l.g.o mailing list |