1 |
I see a lack of coherence in doing that instead. |
2 |
And also, could you tell me the rationale behind your sentence: "I |
3 |
don't think this is interesting for Gentoo". |
4 |
Because I already have explained what advantages it could bring (with |
5 |
a bare minimum effort!). |
6 |
So, i suppose that the opinions around here are just political or |
7 |
driven by resilience to change. Why not offering more? |
8 |
I just wonder... :) |
9 |
|
10 |
2009/4/23 Tomá¹ Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o>: |
11 |
> Dne ètvrtek 23 Duben 2009 05:54:31 Donnie Berkholz napsal(a): |
12 |
>> I don't think this is interesting for Gentoo. Changing the languages is |
13 |
>> not a common use case. You might want to consider adding true support to |
14 |
>> a package manager for splitting a single source package into multiple |
15 |
>> binaries, which would also be useful in so many other ways. |
16 |
> That would me much more benefitical for everyone i guess. So /me is supporting |
17 |
> Donnies proposal. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Cheers |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Tomas |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Fabio Erculiani |
28 |
Sabayon Linux - http://www.sabayon.org |
29 |
My life, my stories. Itsme - http://www.itsme.it |