Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords | ||
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:49:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4381C1CA.7020408@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords by R Hill |
||
| 1 | R Hill wrote: |
| 2 | > Daniel Ahlberg wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >>* if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail |
| 9 | > under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the packages in |
| 10 | > this list so I'm interested in knowing what's worth fixing and what's being |
| 11 | > pedantic. |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Not a blocker but just useless. Filing patches for ebuilds doing this is |
| 15 | greatly appreciated by at least me. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Regards, |
| 18 | Petteri |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Installing COPYING or LICENSE files | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |