| 1 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> R Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>Daniel Ahlberg wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>>* if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>>Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail |
| 12 |
>>under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the packages in |
| 13 |
>>this list so I'm interested in knowing what's worth fixing and what's being |
| 14 |
>>pedantic. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Not a blocker but just useless. Filing patches for ebuilds doing this is |
| 19 |
> greatly appreciated by at least me. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Regards, |
| 22 |
> Petteri |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113680 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So is there a policy about [not] installing the COPYING or LICENSE files |
| 27 |
already? If there isn't one, I propose we make a decision about this to |
| 28 |
have uniform behaviour across the tree. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Regards, |
| 31 |
Petteri |
Archives