| 1 |
* Martin Schlemmer <azarah@××××××××××××.org> schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
<snip> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> > build or unpack both nspr and nss and then look whats laying around |
| 6 |
> > there. the nss sourcetree contains the nsprpub tree. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Yes, but we don't install it with the nss ebuild, as our build uses |
| 10 |
> system nspr. I am sure you could check with upstream, but they will |
| 11 |
> probably say its intended as nss needs nspr if I remember correctly. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
So the nspr subtree in nss is dead code (for gentoo) ? |
| 14 |
Then we better should remove it - just to be sure ;-) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
BTW: it seems both nspr and nss are not really standalone packages, |
| 17 |
but instead snippets from CVS which requires much manual interaction |
| 18 |
(which is done by the ebuild). IMHO it would be worth investing some |
| 19 |
time into making both nspr and nss standalone packages with clean |
| 20 |
pkg-config, etc. Although I dislike autotools for some reasons |
| 21 |
(ie. crosscompiling is very ugly) we could use it until something |
| 22 |
better is available (in fact I'm working on my build tool ...). |
| 23 |
Something Xorg-modular ;-) Many distros would benefit from that. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
cu |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 29 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 30 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 31 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 32 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 33 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 34 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 35 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives