Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:51:08
Message-Id: 46059ce10511261648m6db1041dj1d26b34d10312ea8@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) by "Petteri Räty"
1 On 11/26/05, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
2 > Ned Ludd wrote:
3 > > Good afternoon,
4 > >
5 > > Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF
6 > > executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we
7 > > want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined.
8 > >
9 > > Having a split debug pretty much obsoletes the need to add nostrip to
10 > > your features in order to get debug info.
11 > >
12 > > Users wishing to not have debug info can simply add
13 > > INSTALL_MASK="/usr/lib/debug ${INSTALL_MASK}" to make.conf or the
14 > > environment unless we make it FEATURE based.
15 > >
16 > > I'm in favor of it enabled per default but I'd like to know what you
17 > > think and why. (advantages of on/off by default etc..)
18 > >
19 >
20 > How useful is this debug information with -fomit-frame-pointer? From
21 > what I have read it makes debugging at least harder. I think most people
22 > have -fomit-frame-pointer in their CFLAGS so it should not be enabled by
23 > default if the debug info is not very useful any way.
24
25 Well, only on x86 and other lacking arches...
26 >
27 > Regards,
28 > Petteri
29 >
30 >
31 >
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) Mart Raudsepp <leio@××××××××.net>