Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:45:02
Message-Id: 20130814164445.5f27c1ce@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree by Patrick Lauer
1 On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:41:56 +0800
2 Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
3 > On 08/14/2013 09:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
4 > >>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka
5 > >>> <kensington@g.o> wrote: Right now, however,
6 > >>> it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being
7 > >>> used, trade ideas, etc.
8 >
9 > > No, we can't. Sets are portage-specific, the tree needs to follow
10 > > PMS.
11 >
12 > So fix PMS to reflect reality. Again.
13
14 I think you're misunderstanding the point of a standard here.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>