Archives
Archives
| From: | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree | ||
| Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:42:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 520BA544.8080209@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | On 08/14/2013 09:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 | >>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | >>> Right now, however, |
| 4 | >>> it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being used, |
| 5 | >>> trade ideas, etc. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > No, we can't. Sets are portage-specific, the tree needs to follow PMS. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | So fix PMS to reflect reality. Again. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |