| 1 |
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17 |
| 2 |
Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет: |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Right now, however, |
| 7 |
> > it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being used, |
| 8 |
> > trade ideas, etc. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Well, we can use sets as replacement for metapackages(for example, |
| 11 |
> qt-meta, leechcraft-meta). |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Well, as for leechcraft-meta, we can not simply replace metapackage with |
| 14 |
> set, cause we have unstable USE-flag there. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
No, we can't. Sets are portage-specific, the tree needs to follow PMS. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
Michał Górny |
Archives