Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: leechcraft@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:54:58
Message-Id: 520B7DBD.6070808@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree by Rich Freeman
1 14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
2 > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote:
3 > Right now, however,
4 > it might be useful if only to get a sense for how they're being used,
5 > trade ideas, etc.
6
7 Well, we can use sets as replacement for metapackages(for example,
8 qt-meta, leechcraft-meta).
9
10 Well, as for leechcraft-meta, we can not simply replace metapackage with
11 set, cause we have unstable USE-flag there.
12
13 Any thoughts, leechcraft guys ;-)?
14
15 --
16 Best regards, Sergey Popov
17 Gentoo developer
18 Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead
19 Gentoo Qt project lead
20 Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>