1 |
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:38:42 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 06:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
| > Their commit history backs it up all by itself. |
5 |
| |
6 |
| Ppint to specifically what, in their respective histories, proves your |
7 |
| case. This is like pulling teeth. |
8 |
|
9 |
No, the question is what in their respective histories refutes it. And |
10 |
the answer here is nothing. QA ability isn't something that's assumed, |
11 |
it's something that has to be demonstrated. |
12 |
|
13 |
| > | Where is this code being pushed to, exactly? |
14 |
| > |
15 |
| > Users. |
16 |
| |
17 |
| Please note the difference between pulling and pushing. Pushing |
18 |
| implies that people who don't want sunrise on their systems have to |
19 |
| have it and have to use it. This is not the case. So, again, where |
20 |
| is this code being *pushed* to, exactly? |
21 |
|
22 |
http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060619-newsletter.xml |
23 |
|
24 |
| > The correct way to push through a large change is part of the |
25 |
| > developer quiz. There's no excuse for anyone not knowing it. |
26 |
| |
27 |
| Was it really a *large change* that they pushed through? They haven't |
28 |
| altered the way anybody does things. Any developer or user going |
29 |
| about their normal business does not even have to *think* about |
30 |
| sunrise. Not that large a change, after all. |
31 |
|
32 |
Any developer going about their normal business now has to worry about |
33 |
an officially approved BMGalike, and whether it's causing the bugs |
34 |
they're receiving. Any developer going about their normal business now |
35 |
has to worry about people who know little about the packages they |
36 |
maintain pushing out content that would ordinarily be covered by their |
37 |
herd to users via a back route. |
38 |
|
39 |
| > Would you fly in a plane being piloted by Britney Spears? |
40 |
| |
41 |
| What do I care what the pilot's name is? |
42 |
|
43 |
You care whether or not the pilot knows how to fly a plane. |
44 |
|
45 |
| And how is that relevant to |
46 |
| the discussion, when you've yet to actually show why any of the |
47 |
| Sunrise staff is unfit. |
48 |
|
49 |
To continue with the plane analogy, you don't assume that everyone can |
50 |
fly a plane until they disprove it by crashing one. |
51 |
|
52 |
| Furthermore, there were other questions I asked that you completely |
53 |
| removed from your reply. Please answer those as well. |
54 |
|
55 |
They're not relevant to this discussion. We're not discussing what the |
56 |
right solution is, we're discussing why Sunrise is the wrong solution. |
57 |
There's a hell of a difference -- as an illustration, most people could |
58 |
tell you why giving everybody nukes is the wrong way to get peace in |
59 |
the middle east, but very few could tell you what the right way is... |
60 |
|
61 |
-- |
62 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
63 |
Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk |
64 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
-- |
67 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |