Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:05:35
Message-Id: 200801210005.29587.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Sunday 20 January 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2 > On 08:47 Sun 20 Jan , Richard Freeman wrote:
3 > > Duncan wrote:
4 > >> Obscure? It's the directory name (says another with both /tmp and /var/
5 > >> tmp on tmpfs). How much less obscure can you get than announcing it
6 > >> every time the path is referenced or specified? Who could reasonably
7 > >> argue that tmp doesn't mean tmp?
8 > >
9 > > Anybody who comes from the world of Windows - where temp directories
10 > > aren't cleaned and usually eventually grow to 1/3rd of the disk on a
11 > > typical spyware-laden install?
12 > >
13 > > You and I know what /tmp is for, but we also know that we shouldn't be
14 > > running as root all the time and yet I'm sure there is a note in the
15 > > install handbook about that. 95% of new linux users come from Windows,
16 > > and as such they have a few bad habits that they'd probably be all to
17 > > happy to lose if somebody takes the time to point them out.
18 >
19 > Just one other point here. 95% of new Linux users is not 95% of new
20 > Gentoo Linux users.
21
22 another point: i dont think ive ever met anyone who even knew what the Windows
23 temp directory was or even how to find it. no one relies on that directory
24 to manage their files.
25 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>