| 1 |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:33:59AM +0000, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> posted 46313C29.7050501@g.o, |
| 3 |
> excerpted below, on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:25 -0400: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on |
| 6 |
> > May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this |
| 7 |
> > will obviously be delayed, but do keep this date in mind. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> As I'm sure you are aware, there are more known regressions remaining |
| 10 |
> this time around. As with some others, I'm not all that confident this |
| 11 |
> kernel was ready for release just yet. Oh, well, I suppose there'll be a |
| 12 |
> 2.6.21.1 and etc... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
As no one was actually fixing any of the remaining bugs that were |
| 15 |
reported, what were the kernel developers supposed to do, just sit |
| 16 |
around and wait another week for no reason? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Now we have more people testing :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And yes, this release might be a bit more unstable due to the large core |
| 21 |
changes, but in my testing, I have had no problems. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
thanks, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
greg k-h |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives