| 1 |
On Thursday 05 July 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > maintaining arch things across multiple operating systems is boring me so |
| 4 |
> > i'd like to start moving to profiles that outline arch-specific details |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > for example: |
| 7 |
> > default-linux/parent: |
| 8 |
> > ../base |
| 9 |
> > default-linux/sh/parent: |
| 10 |
> > .. |
| 11 |
> > ../../arch/sh |
| 12 |
> > arch/sh/parent: |
| 13 |
> > .. |
| 14 |
> > arch/parent -> none |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > all of the arch-specific details would be moved out of base/ and into |
| 17 |
> > arch/ (like altivec, sse, sse2, mmx, etc...) and then they can be |
| 18 |
> > unmasked in the respective arch/$arch/ subdir |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > this would be for 2007.1+ profiles and we can leave the old things in |
| 21 |
> > place until we phase out 2007.0 and older completely |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> This is actually something I was already planning on working on setting |
| 24 |
> up. To avoid conflicting with the current profiles, I was planning on |
| 25 |
> making a new profile tree. I wasn't planning on using it for 2007.1's |
| 26 |
> official media, though, but rather just /experimental stuff, since I'd |
| 27 |
> rather get much more testing on it before it goes "live" as the default. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
you proposing we rearchitect it all or just for testing purposes before going |
| 30 |
live ? i can see both ... |
| 31 |
profiles/frags/ |
| 32 |
libc/uclibc/ |
| 33 |
libc/gclibc/ |
| 34 |
arch/amd64/ |
| 35 |
arch/sh/ |
| 36 |
kernel/linux/ |
| 37 |
kernel/bsd/ |
| 38 |
kernel/bsd/freebsd/ |
| 39 |
kernel/bsd/openbsd/ |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
profiles/default-linux/amd64/parent |
| 42 |
../../frags/arch/amd64 |
| 43 |
../../frags/kernel/linux |
| 44 |
../../frags/libc/glibc |
| 45 |
.. |
| 46 |
-mike |
Archives