1 |
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:[Tue Jun 07 2005, 05:32:31PM EDT] |
2 |
> I also vote for alpha. I would like to see some indication of |
3 |
> maintainer arch in metadata too, but in general agree with the |
4 |
> policy of if one arch stabilises then we can assume that is the |
5 |
> maintainer arch. |
6 |
|
7 |
Whoa, careful there. It's not a policy and it's not even |
8 |
a recommendation. I believe there are arch teams that will |
9 |
automatically stable a package after it has been ~arch for a period of |
10 |
time. They will break your assumption. |
11 |
|
12 |
Regards, |
13 |
Aron |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Aron Griffis |
17 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |