| 1 |
read the whole thread. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Spider wrote: |
| 4 |
> the main reason I see against it is that for all that I see there's no |
| 5 |
> way around the cute graphical installer. And, because of that its |
| 6 |
> unlikely that you'll ever get it to work without user intervention. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> one could of course make it download the individual files, modify the |
| 9 |
> ini' and instruct the user to run the installer themselves. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> //Spider |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> begin quote |
| 16 |
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:32:59 -0700 |
| 17 |
> antitux@××××××××.com (John Dee) wrote: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>>I was looking at your netscape packages, and was wondering why you |
| 21 |
>>guys weren't using the 6.x series. The reason I ask, is that the 4.x |
| 22 |
>>series probably won't have another release (I'm the *NIX build |
| 23 |
>>engineer on the project). |
| 24 |
>>I'm also one of the build engineers on the 6.x project. |
| 25 |
>>Also, if needed, I could make a 6.x package for you guys. It really |
| 26 |
>>wouldn't take much to do. |
| 27 |
>>The only thing that might be a problem is the fact I don't know |
| 28 |
>>portage yet (I've been using gentoo a total of about 3 days). |
| 29 |
>>I *COULD* supply you guys with a tarball, and instructions, if you |
| 30 |
>>want. |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>>_______________________________________________ |
| 33 |
>>gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 34 |
>>gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 35 |
>>http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> -- |
| 40 |
> begin .signature |
| 41 |
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 42 |
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 43 |
> end |
Archives