| 1 |
the main reason I see against it is that for all that I see there's no |
| 2 |
way around the cute graphical installer. And, because of that its |
| 3 |
unlikely that you'll ever get it to work without user intervention. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
one could of course make it download the individual files, modify the |
| 6 |
ini' and instruct the user to run the installer themselves. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
//Spider |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
begin quote |
| 13 |
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:32:59 -0700 |
| 14 |
antitux@××××××××.com (John Dee) wrote: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> I was looking at your netscape packages, and was wondering why you |
| 17 |
> guys weren't using the 6.x series. The reason I ask, is that the 4.x |
| 18 |
> series probably won't have another release (I'm the *NIX build |
| 19 |
> engineer on the project). |
| 20 |
> I'm also one of the build engineers on the 6.x project. |
| 21 |
> Also, if needed, I could make a 6.x package for you guys. It really |
| 22 |
> wouldn't take much to do. |
| 23 |
> The only thing that might be a problem is the fact I don't know |
| 24 |
> portage yet (I've been using gentoo a total of about 3 days). |
| 25 |
> I *COULD* supply you guys with a tarball, and instructions, if you |
| 26 |
> want. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 29 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 30 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 31 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
begin .signature |
| 36 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 37 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 38 |
end |
Archives