Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Interaction in ebuilds - bad idea?
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 13:07:45
Message-Id: 200405012206.00620.jstubbs@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Interaction in ebuilds - bad idea? by Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Saturday 01 May 2004 12:36, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
5 > Furthermore, I would like to see immediate failure if a license must be
6 > explicitly accepted and is not in ACCEPT_LICENSES; I find the interactive
7 > prompting to accept licenses problematic for the same reasons as interactive
8 > configuration prompting is problematic.
9
10 When I get around to implementing ACCEPT_LICENSE support, it will function
11 similarly to blockers. When using the -p option, all licenses requiring
12 acceptance will be shown. When not using the -p option, the first license
13 that hasn't been accepted will cause emerge to stop during the dependency
14 calculation phase.
15
16 Regards,
17 Jason Stubbs
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
20
21 iQCVAwUBQJOgt1oikN4/5jfsAQJlvQP9GHZ3R0WpdfovR83JBAW+/jbocZtpnAIK
22 ZuMxy6GeQyLUePN4IhJh59m9J6xMk4dsXRpVRuuz/bbZQ0nKmsPuIyf5AXfBx3zZ
23 C+f+4rCFE8jIPAIi6K7k7MiIllJvwBfnapPzNKT53nJrN/oA4FX9iiWMsZ9Si+89
24 qQpnqZDp5QU=
25 =CKgI
26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
27
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Interaction in ebuilds - bad idea? Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>