1 |
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:25 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> Kurt Lieber wrote: [Sat Nov 19 2005, 04:42:41PM CST] |
3 |
> > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:06:15PM +0000 or thereabouts, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
4 |
> > If the requirement is for r/o CVS access to the same CVS server that the |
5 |
> > pure-blooded developers use (sorry, couldn't resist) then it may require |
6 |
> > upgrades to our existing server and/or purchasing a new server. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> What about authenticated viewcvs on the live CVS server instead? Back |
9 |
> when we had a live viewcvs I used to use it all the time for doing |
10 |
> exactly what the ATs want to do now, and I assume that viewcvs puts much |
11 |
> less load on the server than a CVS pull does. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> In any event, do we need a new server anyway? We actually do have some |
14 |
> money that could be spent on such things, and the CVS server is really |
15 |
> high on the list of for which I, personally, would be more than willing |
16 |
> to spend it. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> -g2boojum- |
19 |
|
20 |
If we were able to purchase hardware then we might as well make it the |
21 |
anon cvs/svn server, no keys/auth are needed then and simple aliases |
22 |
would suffice on toucan maintained by the AT leads. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
27 |
Gentoo Linux |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |