| 1 |
Kurt Lieber wrote: [Sat Nov 19 2005, 04:42:41PM CST] |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:06:15PM +0000 or thereabouts, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 3 |
> If the requirement is for r/o CVS access to the same CVS server that the |
| 4 |
> pure-blooded developers use (sorry, couldn't resist) then it may require |
| 5 |
> upgrades to our existing server and/or purchasing a new server. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
What about authenticated viewcvs on the live CVS server instead? Back |
| 8 |
when we had a live viewcvs I used to use it all the time for doing |
| 9 |
exactly what the ATs want to do now, and I assume that viewcvs puts much |
| 10 |
less load on the server than a CVS pull does. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
In any event, do we need a new server anyway? We actually do have some |
| 13 |
money that could be spent on such things, and the CVS server is really |
| 14 |
high on the list of for which I, personally, would be more than willing |
| 15 |
to spend it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-g2boojum- |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 20 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 21 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 22 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 23 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives