| 1 |
On 07/01/2012 02:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Matt Turner schrieb: |
| 4 |
>>> I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to |
| 5 |
>>> special-case packages that don't install binaries. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags for |
| 8 |
>> certain cases? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Right. It seems to me that not having the ABI flags for packages like |
| 11 |
> x11-proto/* would make more sense, but may be more work to implement. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It seems like this could easily be controlled by setting a PROPERTIES or |
| 14 |
RESTRICT value in the ebuild. Also, it might be useful to give the |
| 15 |
ebuild similar control over the abiwrapper flag via PROPERTIES or RESTRICT. |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Thanks, |
| 18 |
Zac |
Archives