Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 06:46:20
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr_ZaY4p=hEyn+RkM_MRpuSHBAiuX7x=dsGBK=ZhfSWTiw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo by Jaco Kroon
1 On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:16 PM Jaco Kroon <jaco@××××××.za> wrote:
2 >
3 > Hi,
4 >
5 > On 2021/12/01 03:32, William Hubbs wrote:
6 > > This is the part of this that I don't understand. If we aren't enforcing
7 > > an ID, why do we care which ID to try first? It seems to be an
8 > > unnecessary step since users can pick the IDs they want by putting
9 > > settings in make.conf.
10 >
11 > Because when running clusters of hosts it's useful to have the UIDs for
12 > "system" users match. Yes, I know this won't match in a multi-distro
13 > setup, but at least for those of us with clusters consisting only of
14 > Gentoo hosts it will *usually* match. Changing these are possible, but
15 > a nuisance, so having it "just work" for the usual case is great IMHO.
16
17 So questions from my side are:
18 Does your cluster not have human users?
19 Do the userids for the human users also not have to match between
20 hosts in the cluster?
21
22 -A
23
24 >
25 > If I'm not mistaken there is a setting to REQUIRE the ID, and that could
26 > even be set from make.conf, or env/ so for those packages that we care
27 > about that (eg, mailman running on top of glusterfs) we use that.
28 >
29 > Kind Regards,
30 > Jaco
31 >
32 >

Replies