| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Gregory M. Turner <gmt@×××××.us> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 8/16/2012 4:59 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
[snip] |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> tldr: I like, approve and otherwise +1 the idea of somehow paring down or |
| 9 |
> eliminating @system but I think it's going to be fairly challenging, so more |
| 10 |
> discussion on this topic is warranted in my humble non-developer opinion :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> -- |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I really like everything you have to say here. Unfortunately, assumptions |
| 15 |
> of toolchain availability have gotten into the DNA of Gentoo in ways that |
| 16 |
> make it nontrivial -- although probably not rocket science, either -- to |
| 17 |
> implement these ideas. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The limited-visibility build feature discussed a week or so ago would |
| 20 |
go a long way in detecting unexpressed build dependencies. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
:wq |
Archives