| 1 |
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022, at 15:47 CST, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> [...] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm |
| 6 |
> personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I did not intend to imply that you should do anything. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I just want to point out that we had been educating developers for using |
| 11 |
"repoman" to commit for a long time and looking at the "git log" history |
| 12 |
shows that repoman is still used by a sizable number of developers |
| 13 |
(around 50%-ish). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So, it would be very nice to have a somewhat official "blessed" |
| 16 |
alternative in place. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
For example, dev-util/pkgdev was suggested as an alternative, but I |
| 20 |
cannot assess whether this is indeed a viable alternative. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Best, |
| 24 |
Matthias |
Archives