1 |
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 19:26:00 Thomas Anderson wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:06:43PM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 05 May 2009 16:50:47 Richard Freeman wrote: |
4 |
> > > Arch |
5 |
> > > teams seem to be generally doing a good job keeping up with STABLEREQs |
6 |
> > > on the major archs - if you use a minor arch that isn't as well |
7 |
> > > supported I'm sure we'd be happy to have more help. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Arch teams, according to their project pages, are in a good shape. Major |
10 |
> > arches have enough people ( assuming that the project pages are up2date ) |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The amd64 project page at least is definitely not. We have a ton of |
13 |
> slackers. I'd venture to say most in the project don't actively work on |
14 |
> amd64 at all. We are handling the load fairly well though. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Thomas |
17 |
/me is listing all the reported issues |
18 |
|
19 |
Really? I was thinking about joining amd64 project but when I visited the |
20 |
project page , I saw like 25 people listed as developers. So I thought that |
21 |
"Woow,there are plenty of dudes here, so there is no urgent need for new |
22 |
developers right now" |
23 |
|
24 |
This is a major issue as well. If the project pages are way out of date, how |
25 |
do we expect people to understand our real needs on manpower etc. Cleaning and |
26 |
updating the project pages once a while is not that difficult. It takes about |
27 |
15' ( and a couple of e-mails to inform the slackers ). |
28 |
|
29 |
If we really (?) want to run a "recruitment" campaign, our "web presence" but |
30 |
be quite active and responsible. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
34 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Qt/Sunrise/Sound] |
35 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |