Archives
Archives
| From: | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) | ||
| Date: | Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:24:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 531128A2.2090503@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 | > And I would argue that the maintenance cost of having separate /usr in a |
| 3 | > general sense is much higher than the benefit it provides. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | That's a legitimate point (not that I necessarily agree or disagree as |
| 6 | I'm not the one who's tried to make it work) - perhaps I should have |
| 7 | acknowledged that it's still a trade-off. I'm just trying to get rid of |
| 8 | the meme that whatever benefits do exist somehow don't count because |
| 9 | they weren't planned in the original Unix design. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |