Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed addition to the Social Contract
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:14:19
Message-Id: ea440b1d0703251007i28b6cef2u33593442523f3312@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed addition to the Social Contract by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 I'd like to ask what are the negative side-effects of adding such
2 paragraph. Are there any true negative side-effects to a specification
3 like that?
4
5 A different topic is the way the paragraph is written. If we don't
6 like how it is written, we can change it and problem solved.
7
8 To be honest, protecting ourselves from things that now seem
9 improbable, isn't such a bad idea.
10
11 On 3/25/07, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
12 > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> posted
13 > 200703251116.13901.vapier@g.o, excerpted below, on Sun, 25 Mar
14 > 2007 11:16:13 -0400:
15 >
16 > > well, while we're protecting Gentoo from hypothetical situations that
17 > > dont exist now but could in the future, we should add a clause that bans
18 > > collusion with Lucifer as that would of course give us a bad rep
19 >
20 > Umm... let's not go where this seems to be heading...
21 >
22 > --
23 > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
24 > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
25 > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
26 >
27 > --
28 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
29 >
30 >
31
32
33 --
34 Ioannis Aslanidis
35
36 <deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0xB9B11F4E
37 --
38 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies