1 |
I'd like to ask what are the negative side-effects of adding such |
2 |
paragraph. Are there any true negative side-effects to a specification |
3 |
like that? |
4 |
|
5 |
A different topic is the way the paragraph is written. If we don't |
6 |
like how it is written, we can change it and problem solved. |
7 |
|
8 |
To be honest, protecting ourselves from things that now seem |
9 |
improbable, isn't such a bad idea. |
10 |
|
11 |
On 3/25/07, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
12 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> posted |
13 |
> 200703251116.13901.vapier@g.o, excerpted below, on Sun, 25 Mar |
14 |
> 2007 11:16:13 -0400: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> > well, while we're protecting Gentoo from hypothetical situations that |
17 |
> > dont exist now but could in the future, we should add a clause that bans |
18 |
> > collusion with Lucifer as that would of course give us a bad rep |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Umm... let's not go where this seems to be heading... |
21 |
> |
22 |
> -- |
23 |
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
24 |
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
25 |
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
26 |
> |
27 |
> -- |
28 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
35 |
|
36 |
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0xB9B11F4E |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |