| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On 01 Aug 2004 06:30:47 -0400 |
| 3 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Great... no objections! Next step is to having somebody make an |
| 7 |
> announcement in the GWN so that those of you using a $BINHOST that |
| 8 |
> missed this thread will expect this change coming as it's a profile |
| 9 |
> change. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Okay, as one of the binary repo maintainers I'm all for this as it |
| 13 |
simplifies it further for me, currently we do binhost/arch/All.. . for |
| 14 |
exports, And this will cut down some on it.. or add to it.. :P |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
ah. well. I trust the portage devs will take care of informing us on the |
| 17 |
new bright path and then leave it alone as "binary stable" for a year or |
| 18 |
two. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
//Spider |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
begin .signature |
| 25 |
Tortured users / Laughing in pain |
| 26 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 27 |
end |
Archives