1 |
On 22:14 Wed 16 Jan , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
2 |
> Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2013, 00:36:18 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: |
3 |
> OK, I consider this consensus enough. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> ... |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Being the one that does the work, the server profiles are disappearing in |
8 |
> 13.0. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
Err, ok, so now guys, we 're offering a base profile* with dri, cups, gmp, |
12 |
fortran and pppd(?) enabled, at the same time openmp enabled but threads |
13 |
disabled, no sockets, no caps no apache2 or mysql that I would probably |
14 |
want if I wanted to build a server box etc. and we officially drop the |
15 |
server profiles (which is true, they're unmaintained for ages). |
16 |
|
17 |
I've been devaway for long, probably this was discussed in the past (as |
18 |
Ian (axs) pointed out), but am I the only one who finds it a little wrong? Don't |
19 |
get me wrong on my example, above. Eg. I love fortran, however I don't know why I should |
20 |
build it on every gcc update if I don't use it in my server (of course I |
21 |
can disabled it, yes I know). |
22 |
|
23 |
Many have said that a "server" is something very generic, so is |
24 |
"desktop". I think profiles were invented to make things easier and |
25 |
safer for users, so now we 're doing it for "desktop" users but people |
26 |
who want to build a server box have to scratch their heads from the |
27 |
first moment. I'm fine with that if our community is fine with that. |
28 |
|
29 |
I'm not blaming anyone, as the server profiles are useless atm, it was the |
30 |
right call to remove them. I'm just wondering if this happened because they |
31 |
were not maintained properly or because we really don't need them. |
32 |
|
33 |
Panagiotis |
34 |
|
35 |
* I took as example the base default/linux/amd64/10.0 . |
36 |
|
37 |
ps. I'll try find the old discussions which may help me understand |
38 |
things better. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) |
42 |
( Gentoo Lisp Project ) |