| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> | Local news delivery *should* still be using the user label. Unique |
| 3 |
> | repo internal labels don't matter to glep42, since the label that |
| 4 |
> | news delivery _should_ use is what the user's configuration has named |
| 5 |
> | it. |
| 6 |
> | |
| 7 |
> | Just stating it, since tagging a unique id into the repo isn't a hold |
| 8 |
> | up for glep42. What is an issue with glep42 is planning for N repos, |
| 9 |
> | eg another level of dirs/indirection as has already been stated. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The holdup for GLEP 42 is that you're trying to demand that it supports |
| 12 |
> some arbitrary future extension to Portage without specifying how that |
| 13 |
> extension will work. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I get it. The Portage team asks you to extend your spec, so you turn it around and ask them to extend their spec. Ha ha ha. Funny game. :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Brian agreed with you that the extended dep syntax will be necessary at some point in the future. I also agree. So, knowing that glep 42 doesn't require extended depset syntax, can we stop playing this game and just settle on something like newsdir="$(portageq newsdir gentoo)"? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Zac |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives