| 1 |
I agree with brad, I proposed the emerge inject solution was how this |
| 2 |
problem was intended to be dealt with but couldn't quite make sense of |
| 3 |
the reason this didn't work from the thread. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
could someone possibly clearly give the arguement against injecting |
| 6 |
again for us slow people? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
dave |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 20:22, Brad Laue wrote: |
| 11 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 12 |
> > so ! last call, does anyone really trully hate the idea of dummy-sources ? |
| 13 |
> > if not i'm going to go ahead and add it to the tree |
| 14 |
> > - -mike |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It doesn't make any sense. If the original poster uses custom-patched |
| 17 |
> kernels, surely he can create his custom-patches against vanilla-sources? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> It seems to me that dummy-sources would be duplicating emerge -i |
| 20 |
> functionality if no true sources are to be installed, and would be |
| 21 |
> duplicating vanilla-sources if untouched sources are to be installed. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Brad |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Dave Nellans |
| 30 |
http://lucy.wox.org/~dnellans/ |
| 31 |
dnellans@×××××××.edu |
Archives