| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 04/09/12 01:32 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 09/04/2012 10:05 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
| 6 |
>> I believe the easiest (and honestly most sane) method is to |
| 7 |
>> simply have src_fetch in the live classes check for needed deps |
| 8 |
>> and die (with a "please emerge blah") if deps are not found. |
| 9 |
>> Adding something like FDEPEND just seems to be getting way too |
| 10 |
>> crazy on the dependency tree AND would require things to build |
| 11 |
>> during fetch-only which doesn't make sense. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I think it's nicer to have FDEPEND because it makes the deps more |
| 14 |
> complete, so the package manager can bail out when necessary, |
| 15 |
> without even executing src_fetch. In the case of --fetchonly the |
| 16 |
> package manager could simply bail out if the deps are not installed |
| 17 |
> (like how it bails out for --buildpkgonly when the deps aren't |
| 18 |
> installed). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Just looking into the future here; would things like archivers or |
| 21 |
other helpers used by src_unpack move to FDEPEND as well? or would |
| 22 |
this be limited solely to tools that data transfer? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlBGXQYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDKGwEAlvqkQHBv2vDtGfYNYrIIMIV9 |
| 30 |
1le8HgtXRhIu9FOhw1EA/3m1xc4zNcWMslK6RiV5sn4mBVXUQt6Ry2m/Nar+ccFq |
| 31 |
=DqcL |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives