| 1 |
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:30:11 +0000 George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'd rather make it known that that sort of backhanded tactics to |
| 4 |
> > get rid of someone you don't like won't work whoever uses them. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> You would certainly make that point. then let the other employee |
| 7 |
> leave and let the employee in question know that it will not be |
| 8 |
> tolerated in the future. Therefore saving the services of one of the |
| 9 |
> best employees (and with it money) and also said employee |
| 10 |
> knows /exactly/ where he stands for the future. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
And if said employee had already pulled several "I'm resigning" |
| 13 |
publicity stunts in the past? And if said employee had seen other |
| 14 |
people trying the same thing unsuccessfully? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I think you're missing a clear view of the facts here... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Incidentally, I'm unsure as to how your analogy applies here. You keep |
| 19 |
mentioning 'best employee'. I'm not sure how that fits in. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 23 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 24 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 25 |
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |
Archives