Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:34:59
Message-Id: 45F8A1A3.8080608@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? by Stephen Bennett
1 Stephen Bennett wrote:
2 > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:35:14 +0000
3 > George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >> So you'd rather let one of the best employees go rather than chastise
7 >> a worker who is leaving soon? Thats just cutting off your nose to
8 >> spite your face.
9 >>
10 >
11 > I'd rather make it known that that sort of backhanded tactics to get rid
12 > of someone you don't like won't work whoever uses them.
13 >
14 You would certainly make that point. then let the other employee leave
15 and let the employee in question know that it will not be tolerated in
16 the future. Therefore saving the services of one of the best employees
17 (and with it money) and also said employee knows /exactly/ where he
18 stands for the future.
19
20 It is called man-management and people skills, something that is
21 severely lacking in Gentoo at the moment
22 --
23 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>